🔗 Share this article I'm a Hardcore Capitalist, But Universal Medicare Is the Top Hope for American Health System Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits. Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – seems like demands a PhD in medical insurance. The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly According to a recent study, typical households spends $27,000 each year for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025. Now the government has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes regarding subsidies that experts say could cause a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans. When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare? How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I have to believe we're getting closer because this can't continue. I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How medical professionals receive payment would change. Trust me, they will adjust. How Universal Coverage Could Function A national health insurance program would need contributions from workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker making moderate income pays approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent. Does this seem expensive? Unless you contrast that with what the typical US resident spends. I know dozens of clients that are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, these contributions also cover pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection along with supporting medical services. When including these expenses compared with our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the difference decreases. Implementation in the US For America, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. And, like much of federal defense, technology, social programs and transportation services, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies. Advantages for Entrepreneurs Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would make management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers). It would make simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of going through the complicated (and ineffective) process of bargaining with major insurers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding of coverage by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer have access to workers' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and different options. Free-Market Viewpoint I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that government play important functions in society, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses that employ the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive. Addressing Concerns Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would remain a better and less expensive strategy both for managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone. Need for Realistic Evaluation We as Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank well below numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, according to major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect in this current situation could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and agree that big changes need to happen.